What do you think defines a person?
Is it the accumulated reputation of impeccability that he has built over the years, behind the veil of conceited sanctity or is it the unusual careless, naked self that rebels against the obscene moratorium of vanity ?
Which is more important – truth or admissible interpretations of it?
If a moment of truth can destroy a person, the premise on which this foundation of ‘characterization’ lies must be severely scrutinized. They are contradictory and hence, they nullify each other.